In my opinion, one can hardly discuss Strawson's argument about the fact that Caesar was assassinated in the Senate is not identical to the event which took place in a. 44 years C. and which had to experience. The fact that ... , that can affirm and deny in the speech, not something in the world of experience resunta correspondence without falling into a category mistake. Peirce Let's talk here. (Karl Otto Apel, "theory of truth and discourse ethics, " ed, Paidós (Page 90 et seq.) A necessary complement Habermas's theory of discourse. I think this is the result of a foundation, in line with Pierce,
consensus theory of truth.
The theory I have outlined here see it as a necessary complement of the Habermasian theory of discourse. Without such supplementation, the latter not in a position to differentiate, so criteriológicamente relevant to a theory of truth as
C HTMLXC
by referring to the speech perceptual judgments and that was invoked immediately as reasons for the statement of facts: that speech could only be, strictly speaking, relate to each other statements accepted as equally true potential, for example, hypotheses to theories, in the sense of possible integrability or, in any case, "the basic proposals" alleged TMLXC evidence of experience (based, ultimately, despite all interpretation, in
) would be softened as always, is reduced to a conflict between statements or theory ; as competing. But this ignores one of the main reasons posig.
~
three references to the world
In connection with Habermas's distinction of three references to the world (the objective world and subjective world of inner social world) and the corresponding functionsLXC
within the meaning of intersubjectively valid knowledge . (The third reference to the world, it is for the expressive function of language, go to function in this context only as a natural claim of authenticity in the linguistic formulation of intent of meaning .) CHTML
Following the trip, after eating walked av xD currentsManyana will sleep xDD