In the early 1990's were again fashionable theories of Joseph Schumpeter. Fortunately, in the middle of 1970, my course at Harvard's history of economic thought was in charge of Arthur Smithies, probably Schumpeter's best friend at Harvard, and became essentially a course on Schumpeter and his theory ace. Although Schumpeter himself is nottobacco interested in poverty, it seems that its theories describe default and could offer an explanatory theory of why Washintong Consensus principles have been so costly for many LDCs s the world's poor. My work required to relate several different academic disciplines, especially evolutionary economics (Schumpeter), development economics, the history of economic thought Economic and economic history. It seemed as if to understand the unequal economic developmentspecial word to the readers of the Third World. At first glance it may seem a Eurocentric book. Does not start, for example, by the vision of capitalism Norwegian-American economist Thorstein Veblen (1857-1929) as an advanced system of piracy, though history tells us that this is a legitimate vision . Instead, I focus on how to set up Europe's economic power became dominant: their "economies of scale in the use of force." The book does not detail the crimes and injustices committed by white, European or not, in the Third World, but particularly serves the purpose much more; S subtle-and long-term even more damaging to the economic and social theories that omit vital clues to the generation of wealth and poverty. The book itemizes not slavery itself, but the legacy of slavery in productive systems, social and land tenure that have blocked economic development even today. It focuses on the understanding of capitalism as a system of economic policy productionand appropriate and inappropriate.
Most known civilizations were not European, and a paLCAN and eastern Mediterranean, while Venice, defending the southeastern edge of Europe, was gradually losing their possessions in that area, until 1571, when the major powers joined eurpeas circumstantially to deal with the Turks in the Battle of Lepanto, it definitely stopped the deterioration of the balance of power to the detriment of the Europeans.
Erik S. Reinert,
, ed. Crítica, Barcelona, 2007, pp.10 et seq.
0 comments:
Post a Comment