Why was strengthened from both Europe then? Given the current huge gaps in the distribution of world income, the question is also how and why so evenly distributed development in Europe, reaching a relative homogeneity as apparent in the eighteenth century from the north of Sweden to the Mediterranean. Why is it seemingly impossible to repeat the same experience in Africa? It is clear that there were many factors that contributed to European progress: the location of their sources of power (carb & Overhaulthe American conomic Moses Abramovitz (1912-2000) used in the same sense of incentive and competition dynamics.
Modern economics recommends a strategy based on "comparative advantage" that constitute the backbone of international trade theory of David Ricardo: each nation should specialize in that economic activity which is relatively more efficient. After the shock of the launch of the first Sputnik in 1957, which highlighted the advantage it had in that time with respect to the United States in lthe Soviet Union, but totally contrary to the Ricardian spirit. In fact, the Ricardian economy has generated self-referential logic elements that evoke the worst caricatures of scholasticism. Since the dynamics that create the need for emulation has been removed from the theory, the Ricardian framework leads to policy conclusions counterintuitive. Dynamic elements of progress and technological change resulting from the intuitive logic emulation, set against static specialization, are simply absent.
CHTr at that time was probably the fastest means of transport in the world: the sled on skis pulled by reindeer. Two of Germany's most important economists of the eighteenth century were also important philosophers, Christian Wolff (1679-1754) and Johann Heinrich Gottlob von Justi (1717-1771), wrote books praising civilization China, and the Inca in the case of Von Justi, one and one argued that Europe should not emulate the European institutions. In 1723 Wolff was ordered to leave within forty-eight hours the University of Halle-at that time dominated by the Pietist, a Protestant movement, on pain of being hanged por his claim that Chinese Philosophy and ethics were impressive and showed that outside of Christianity also could find moral truths. Saved by the rivalry between the small German states, moved to a neighboring state whose ruler wanted to recruit for University of Marburg. In fact one can argue that European ethnocentrism, an important ingredient of colonialism and imperialism, not gained momentum until the early 1770, when "ethnic nations" became an obstacle to the constructio n the emerging nation-state empires (incidentally, i have notprivate vices public benefits report. In Europe was for centuries a variety of approaches regarding tecnologíay institutions, the combination of diversity and emulation led to many schools of theory and technology solutions, continually compared, molded and developed markets. Competition between city-states, later between nation-state-funded inventions flow also emerged as unintended byproducts of emulation among nations and rulers in war and luxury. Once it was observed that some of the resources devoted to solving problems in periodlast sta.
The doctrine of comparative advantage, designed by Ricardo, is the foundation of the current international economic order. A prominent U.S. economist Paul Krugman says that "intellectuals" do not understand the idea of Ricardo's comparative advantage, which is "absolutely certain, immensely sophisticated and extremely relevant to the modern world." I argue the opposite: that the economics of Ricardo, by removing economic theory a qualitative understanding of the changes and economic dinñamica, has becomeGlobalization of Poverty (How rich countries got rich ... and why poor countries remain poor) , ed. Crítica, Barcelona, 2007, pp.12-19.
0 comments:
Post a Comment